A demonstrably safer nuclear plant wouldn’t need to be built ten miles or more outside of its service area. It’s safe to install in clusters according to the power needs of a specific area, and because of its tiny size, these reactors are much easier to encase in safety devices and contain in the event of an emergency. NuScale’s next generation nuclear reactor is tiny by comparison to today’s operating reactors in the U.S. The Navy Signs Up for 9 New Nuclear SubmarineĮven so, nuclear power accounts for two-thirds of the United States’s total renewable power output, meaning any reactor that reaches end of life can significantly reduce our amount of renewable energy.Like our aging and increasingly dangerous infrastructure, these nuclear plants need to be comprehensively updated or replaced, and soon. “Only two new reactors are under construction in the U.S., but they’re billions of dollars over budget and years behind schedule,” Wired reports. ![]() ![]() One completed in 2016, started construction back in 1973. nuclear power reactor opened in 1969, and even the newest powered on in the mid-1990s. Their cutting-edge reactor is tiny and, its proponents insist, much safer than our existing notions of nuclear energy lead us to believe. NuScale Power studies new reactor technology from a lab on the Oregon State University campus-the same university where the 2019 climate crisis petition began. nuclear plants are reaching end of life, and the technology is simply outdated.Īn energy startup in Oregon wants us to rethink our reluctance to embrace nuclear energy, Wired reports. The reactors can be installed in multiples to scale up or down to a location’s power needs.An Oregon energy startup has a modular nuclear power reactor 1/100th the size of a traditional reactor and is supposedly far safer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |